Reader Comments
Post a new comment on this article
Post Your Discussion Comment
Please follow our guidelines for comments and review our competing interests policy. Comments that do not conform to our guidelines will be promptly removed and the user account disabled. The following must be avoided:
- Remarks that could be interpreted as allegations of misconduct
- Unsupported assertions or statements
- Inflammatory or insulting language
Thank You!
Thank you for taking the time to flag this posting; we review flagged postings on a regular basis.
closeConclusion a real stretch
Posted by CraigT123 on 20 Jan 2014 at 17:43 GMT
So putting aside that all female problems are caused by men, the conclusion seems a real stretch.
Let's suppose that all of these males that want young females mate with all of the young females. Since they don't know which of these young women will menopause sooner than the other ( and don't care ) how is this causing selection among the population? Answer - it doesn't affect the menopause selection at all.
In sparely populated societies which was the norm until very recently in human evolution, it is most likely that males mated with every female, every time when presented the option. How did that cause selection bias? It didn't.
Most men, given the choice between younger vs older will choose younger but most men will also choose sex with an older women over no sex. This probably means that all women where getting enough sex to get pregnant which would bias the evolution towards extending time before menopause because that would be the women having babies at 50 or 55. This is the question you should be answering - why did women choose to stop being fertile at 50 or 55?
Child birth is a naturally dangerous process and very taxing on a women's body. Most likely this is self preservation or just the fact that until a couple of hundred years ago, few people lived past 50 years old.