TY - JOUR T1 - Measuring Global Credibility with Application to Local Sequence Alignment A1 - Webb-Robertson, Bobbie-Jo M. A1 - McCue, Lee Ann A1 - Lawrence, Charles E. Y1 - 2008/05/16 N2 - Author SummarySequence alignment is the cornerstone capability used by a multitude of computational biology applications, such as phylogeny reconstruction and identification of common regulatory mechanisms. Sequence alignment methods typically seek a high-scoring alignment between a pair of sequences, and assign a statistical significance to this single alignment. However, because a single alignment of two (or more) sequences is a point estimate, it may not be representative of the entire set (ensemble) of possible alignments of those sequences; thus, there may be considerable uncertainty associated with any one alignment among an immense ensemble of possibilities. To address the uncertainty of a proposed alignment, we used a Bayesian probabilistic approach to assess an alignment's reliability in the context of the entire ensemble of possible alignments. Our approach performs a global assessment of the degree to which the members of the ensemble depart from a selected alignment, thereby determining a credibility limit. In an evaluation of the popular maximum similarity alignment and the centroid alignment (i.e., the alignment that is in the center of the posterior distribution of alignments), we find that the centroid yields tighter credibility limits (on average) than the maximum similarity alignment. Beyond the usual interest in putting error limits on point estimates, our findings of substantial variability in credibility limits of alignments argue for wider adoption of these limits, so the degree of error is delineated prior to the subsequent use of the alignments. JF - PLOS Computational Biology JA - PLOS Computational Biology VL - 4 IS - 5 UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000077 SP - e1000077 EP - PB - Public Library of Science M3 - doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000077 ER -