Advertisement
Research Article

Data-Driven Modeling of Src Control on the Mitochondrial Pathway of Apoptosis: Implication for Anticancer Therapy Optimization

  • Annabelle Ballesta mail,

    annabelle.ballesta@inria.fr

    Affiliation: BANG project team, INRIA Rocquencourt, Le Chesnay, Yvelines, France

    X
  • Jonathan Lopez,

    Affiliations: Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052/CNRS UMR5286, Lyon, Rhône, France, Université de Lyon - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, Rhône, France, Hospices Civils de Lyon - Fédération de Biochimie Nord - Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, Rhône, France

    X
  • Nikolay Popgeorgiev,

    Affiliations: Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052/CNRS UMR5286, Lyon, Rhône, France, Université de Lyon - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, Rhône, France

    X
  • Philippe Gonzalo,

    Affiliations: Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052/CNRS UMR5286, Lyon, Rhône, France, Université de Lyon - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, Rhône, France, Hospices Civils de Lyon - Fédération de Biochimie Nord - Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, Rhône, France

    X
  • Marie Doumic ,

    Affiliation: BANG project team, INRIA Rocquencourt, Le Chesnay, Yvelines, France

    These authors equally supervised this work.

    X
  • Germain Gillet

    Affiliations: Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, INSERM U1052/CNRS UMR5286, Lyon, Rhône, France, Université de Lyon - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, Rhône, France

    These authors equally supervised this work.

    X
  • Published: April 04, 2013
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011

Abstract

Src tyrosine kinases are deregulated in numerous cancers and may favor tumorigenesis and tumor progression. We previously described that Src activation in NIH-3T3 mouse fibroblasts promoted cell resistance to apoptosis. Indeed, Src was found to accelerate the degradation of the pro-apoptotic BH3-only protein Bik and compromised Bax activation as well as subsequent mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization. The present study undertook a systems biomedicine approach to design optimal anticancer therapeutic strategies using Src-transformed and parental fibroblasts as a biological model. First, a mathematical model of Bik kinetics was designed and fitted to biological data. It guided further experimental investigation that showed that Bik total amount remained constant during staurosporine exposure, and suggested that Bik protein might undergo activation to induce apoptosis. Then, a mathematical model of the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis was designed and fitted to experimental results. It showed that Src inhibitors could circumvent resistance to apoptosis in Src-transformed cells but gave no specific advantage to parental cells. In addition, it predicted that inhibitors of Bcl-2 antiapoptotic proteins such as ABT-737 should not be used in this biological system in which apoptosis resistance relied on the deficiency of an apoptosis accelerator but not on the overexpression of an apoptosis inhibitor, which was experimentally verified. Finally, we designed theoretically optimal therapeutic strategies using the data-calibrated model. All of them relied on the observed Bax overexpression in Src-transformed cells compared to parental fibroblasts. Indeed, they all involved Bax downregulation such that Bax levels would still be high enough to induce apoptosis in Src-transformed cells but not in parental ones. Efficacy of this counterintuitive therapeutic strategy was further experimentally validated. Thus, the use of Bax inhibitors might be an unexpected way to specifically target cancer cells with deregulated Src tyrosine kinase activity.

Author Summary

Personalizing medicine on a molecular basis has proven its clinical benefits. The molecular study of the patient's tumor and healthy tissues allowed the identification of determinant mutations and the subsequent optimization of healthy and cancer cells specific response to treatments. Here, we propose a combined mathematical and experimental approach for the design of optimal therapeutics strategies tailored to the patient molecular profile. As an in vitro proof of concept, we used parental and Src-transformed NIH-3T3 fibroblasts as a biological model. Experimental study at a molecular level of those two cell populations demonstrated differences in the gene expression of key-controllers of the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis thus suggesting potential therapeutic targets. Molecular mathematical models were built and fitted to existing experimental data. They guided further experimental investigation of the kinetics of the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis which allowed their refinement. Finally, optimization procedures were applied to those data-calibrated models to determine theoretically optimal therapeutic strategies that would maximize the anticancer efficacy on Src-transformed cells under the constraint of a maximal allowed toxicity on parental cells.

Introduction

Protein tyrosine kinases of the Src family are involved in multiple facets of cell physiology including survival, proliferation, motility and adhesion [1]. Their deregulation has been described in numerous malignancies such as colorectal, breast, melanoma, prostate, lung or pancreatic cancers and is known to favor tumorigenesis and tumor progression [2][4].

Modulation of apoptosis sensitivity by Src deregulation is more controversial. We recently described that Src activation promotes resistance to the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in mouse and human cancer cell lines [5]. The molecular mechanism underlying such resistance involved the accelerated degradation of the proapoptotic BH3-only protein Bik. Indeed, in Src-transformed NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblasts, Bik was found to be phosphorylated by activated Erk1/2, which was followed by Bik subsequent polyubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation [5]. Thus in Src-transformed cells, Bik downregulation compromised Bax activation and mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) permeabilization upon an apoptotic stress [5].

That observation might be of importance since MOM permeabilization is the key step that commits cells to apoptosis. Indeed, MOM permeabilization leads to the irreversible release of cytochrome c and other cytotoxic molecules from the mitochondrial inter-membrane space into the cytosol [6], [7]. Once released, cytochrome c induces the formation of the apoptosome complex, which triggers caspase activation, these molecules being the main executioners of the apoptotic program. MOM permeabilization is triggered by the insertion and oligomerization of the pro-apoptotic effector Bax into the membrane [8][11]. Antiapoptotic proteins such as Bcl-2 or Bcl-xL prevent this process, whereas pro-apoptotic BH3-only proteins contribute to Bax activation [6], [11][16]. Using western blotting and specific shRNAs, the respective contribution of the different Bcl-2 family members to the cell response triggered by various death- inducing agents was assessed in parental and Src-transformed NIH-3T3 fibroblasts [5].

Experimentally and mathematically investigating the cell response to death-inducing agents might be of interest since it has long been postulated that restoration of apoptosis might be an effective way to selectively kill cancer cells. The rationale of this assumption is that cancer cells need to counteract the pro-apoptotic effect of oncogenes such as Myc or E2F-1 that stimulate cell proliferation as well [17]. Moreover, Src deregulation has specifically been associated with resistance to treatment in a number of cancers [18], [19]. Therefore, a critical clinical concern lies in the design of therapeutic strategies that would circumvent resistance to apoptosis of cells with deregulated Src activity. To this end, several classes of therapeutic agents might be a priori considered. Inhibitors of Src tyrosine kinases, such as dasatinib, are currently widely used in the clinic [20][23]. Other anticancer therapeutic strategies aim at restoring apoptosis in cancer cells [24]. In particular, inhibitors of antiapoptotic proteins such as ABT-737 or the Oblimersen Bcl-2 antisense oligodeoxyribonucleotide are currently evaluated in clinical trials [25][28]. Apoptosis may also be restored by increasing the expression of pro-apoptotic proteins such as Bax, Bik or p53 [29][32].

Here we propose a systems biology approach for optimizing potential anticancer therapeutic strategies using parental and Src-transformed NIH 3T3 fibroblasts as a biological model. To this end, molecular mathematical models of Bik kinetics and of the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis were built and fitted to available experimental data. They guided further experimental investigation in parental and Src-transformed cells which allowed their refinement. Then, those models were used to generate predictions which were validated by subsequent specifically-designed experiments. Finally, we theoretically explored different drug combinations involving the kinase inhibitor staurosporine, Src inhibitors, and activators or inhibitors of the Bcl-2 protein family, in order to design optimal anticancer strategies for this biological system. Optimal strategies were defined as those which maximized the efficacy on Src-transformed cells considered as cancer cells under the constraint of toxicity remaining under a tolerable threshold in parental cells.

Results

Bik kinetics in non-apoptotic conditions

We recently provided evidence that Bik, a BH3-only protein, is a key regulator of apoptosis in the considered biological system [5]. Therefore we first built a mathematical model to investigate Bik kinetics in non-apoptotic conditions. Bik concentration temporal variations were assumed to result from two processes: protein formation and protein polyubiquitylation, which eventually leads to its degradation. Let us denote and the intracellular concentration of Bik and polyubiquitylated Bik proteins respectively, expressed in nM.

Bik protein was assumed to be synthesized at a constant rate in both Src-transformed and parental cells as suggested by similar Bik mRNA level in both cell types [5]. Concerning Bik ubiquitylation, we considered that it occurred either spontaneously at the rate , or after Bik phosphorylation by activated Erk1/2 downstream of SRC activation, as demonstrated in Src-transformed fibroblasts ([5], Figure 1). In those cells, this prior phosphorylation increased Bik ubiquitylation rate and further proteasomal degradation. This Src-dependent pathway was modeled by Michaelis-Menten kinetics with parameters and . In the model, we assumed that spontaneous and Src-mediated ubiquitylation could occur in both transformed and parental cells. Ubiquitin molecules were assumed to be in large excess compared to Bik amount. Therefore ubiquitin concentration was considered as constant and implicitly included in and .

thumbnail

Figure 1. Bik kinetics in non-apoptotic conditions.

proteins are polyubiquitylated () prior to their proteasomal degradation. This ubiquitylation occurs spontaneously in parental NIH-3T3 cells and is enhanced in Src-transformed cells through Src-dependent activation of Erk1/2 kinases which accelerate Bik phosphorylation (), thus favoring its ubiquitylation.

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011.g001

Poly-ubiquitylated molecules were then assumed to be degraded by the proteasome at a constant rate in both cell types. was arbitrary set to 1 as it does not influence kinetics, and only acts on . The model of Bik kinetics can be written as follows:(1)
(2)

Parameters were then estimated for parental and Src-transformed cells by fitting experimental results on Bik protein degradation in both cell types ([5], reprinted with permission in Figure 2B). We assumed that the spontaneous phosphorylation occurred at the same rate in parental and Src-transformed fibroblasts and therefore looked for a unique . Parameters of Src-dependent Bik degradation were denoted and in parental cells and and in Src-transformed 3T3 cells. Inhibition of Src kinase activity by herbimycin was experimentally monitored in Src-transformed cells (Figure 2A, reprinted with permission from [5]). Herbimycin exposure achieved a decrease of 98% in phosphorylated Y416 amount. Therefore, we modeled herbimycin exposure as a decrease of 98% in values. See Text S1 for details on the parameter estimation procedure.

thumbnail

Figure 2. Estimating Bik degradation rates in control and Src-transformed cells.

A Endogenous Bik level was compared with Src level and Src kinase activity as monitored by Y416 phosphorylation in Src-transformed cells. v-Src kinase activity was inhibited either by herbimycin or by incubation at 39.5°C. Src inhibition by herbimycin was quantified to 98%. Reprinted with permission from [5] B Bik degradation was monitored in parental and Src-transformed cells. v-Src kinase activity was inhibited by herbimycin in transformed cells. Dots are experimental results reprinted from [5]. Solid lines represent the best fit of Bik kinetics mathematical model (Equations 1 and 2). See Results for parameter values.

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011.g002

The best-fit parameter value for the spontaneous ubiquitylation was . Src-dependent ubiquitylation was predicted to be inactive in normal fibroblasts as , which was in agreement with experimental results [5]. On the contrary, the Src pathway was predominant in transformed cells as and which leads to

The dynamical system 1–2 admits a unique steady state:

where . For parental cells, in which is equal to zero, steady state becomes .

Bik steady-state concentrations in parental cells was assumed to be equal to 50 nM which is in the physiological range of BH3-only protein intracellular levels [33][37]. This allowed us to deduce . We then computed Bik steady-state concentrations in Src-transformed cells which was equal to nM. Thus, the simulated ratio of Bik concentration in Src-transformed cells over that in parental cells was equal to 0.18 which is similar to the experimentally-observed value quantified to 0.2 (Figure 3, Table 1). This constitutes a partial validation of the model since the data of Figure 3 was not used in Bik kinetics model design and calibration. In the following, these steady state concentrations were used as Bik initial condition since cells were assumed to be in non-apoptotic conditions prior to the death stimulus.

thumbnail

Figure 3. Western blotting analyses of the Bcl-2 family proteins in control (Ctrl) and v-src-transformed cells (Src).

Differential centrifugation was used for cell fractionation. Each experiment was repeated at least twice. Mitochondrial Hsp70 and a-tubulin were used as loading controls for mitochondrial fractions and 10 000× g supernatants (10 000 g SN), respectively (loading 100 mg proteins). Whole cell lysates from HeLa (Bcl-w), BP3 (Bfl1/A1), 293T (Noxa and Bmf) and WT MEF (Bak) cells were used as positive controls when proteins were undetected. Data were reprinted with permission from [5].

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011.g003
thumbnail

Table 1. Ratios of the different BCL-2 family proteins involved in staurosporine-induced apoptosis.

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011.t001

Bik kinetics upon apoptotic stress

We then investigated Bik kinetics in parental and Src-transformed NIH-3T3 cells in response to an apoptotic stress that consisted of a 8-hour-long exposure to staurosporine (2 M). As demonstrated by knockdown experiments (Figure 2b in [5]), Bik was required for apoptosis induction. Bik was present in non-transformed cells with no sign of apoptosis in normal conditions, which suggested either that Bik concentration was not large enough to trigger apoptosis in these conditions, or that Bik was activated upon apoptotic stress.

The first assumption to be mathematically investigated was that Bik protein amount might increase upon staurosporine treatment as a result of the turning-off of the degradation processes, Bik synthesis rate remaining unchanged under staurosporine treatment. Thus, if Bik ubiquitylation process is turned off in the model, only the formation term remains in equation 1 which is now the same for parental and transformed cells, with different initial conditions. This equation can be solved analytically:(3)
where stands for Bik initial concentration taken equal to Bik steady state concentration in parental and transformed fibroblasts. We did not observe any significant apoptosis either in normal or Src-transformed cells in the first six hours of staurosporine treatment (data not shown). In non-transformed cells, setting t = 360 min in equation 3 gave which meant that Bik concentration would only double in six hours if this hypothesis was right. This was tested by measuring Bik protein level during staurosporine exposure in parental cells. However, no significant increase in Bik levels upon a 6 hour-long staurosporine treatment was observed, which ruled out that the induction of apoptosis could depend on Bik accumulation (Figure 4 A).

thumbnail

Figure 4. Bik behavior after a death stimulus.

A Bik immunoblotting in presence of staurosporine in parental NIH-3T3 cells. Bik protein amount remained constant during apoptosis. B Bik relocalized from ER to mitochondria during staurosporine exposure in parental NIH-3T3 cells. Mitochondria were labeled by Mitotracker (red). Endogenous Bik was tracked by an anti-Bik-BH3 and a secondary antibody labeled with FITC (green). Yellow indicated colocalization.

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011.g004

Therefore, we investigated a second hypothesis that consisted of an activation of Bik upon apoptosis induction. Such a possibility might rely on a release of Bik from a protein complex upon apoptotic stress as observed with other BH3-only proteins such as Bad, Bim or Bmf [38]. To investigate the likelihood of this hypothesis, we performed the immunostaining of endogenous Bik in parental NIH-3T3 cells upon staurosporine exposure. Our data was in agreement with a relocation of Bik from its known location at the ER to the mitochondria within 2 h of treatment ([39], [40], Figure 4 B). This relocation might correspond to Bik release from a binding protein at the ER as previously observed [41]. We modeled this relocation by the equations 4 and 5 in which stands for Bik protein that had been activated possibly through this relocation and represents inactive Bik molecules. This translocation occurred at the rate . Colocalization between Bik fluorescence and mitotracker staining showed that 4513% of Bik molecules were located at the mitochondria within 2 h of treatment which led to the estimated value (Figure 4 B).

Designing a mathematical model of the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts

We then investigated the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in NIH-3T3 parental and Src-transformed cells. We only considered the Bcl-2 members that were experimentally detected in this biological model [5]. The only pro-apoptotic multidomain effector was Bax, whereas the multidomain antiapoptotic protein family was represented by Bcl-2, Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 [5]. Five BH3-only proteins were present: three BH3-only activators (i.e. able to directly bind and activate Bax) Puma, Bim and tBid and two BH3-only sensitizers (i.e. able to bind Bcl-2 and related apoptosis inhibitors, but unable to bind and activate Bax) Bad and Bik. The respective role of present BH3-only proteins in apoptosis induction was assessed by a shRNA-mediated approach.

Bim, which was expressed at very low level, could be neglected in the onset of apoptosis, since its downregulation induced no significant increase in apoptosis resistance upon staurosporine, thapsigargin or etoposide. In contrast, PUMA had a prominent role for apoptosis induced by genotoxic stresses (UV or etoposide) but displayed no significant role in staurosporine- and thapsigargin-induced apoptosis [5]. As we focused here on staurosporine-induced apoptosis, the only BH3-only activator that we considered was tBid. Concerning BH3-only sensitizers, Bad could be neglected as its silencing by shRNA did not significantly modify cell response to staurosporine. Therefore the only sensitizer to be considered was Bik.

Bax, Bik and tBid were described to bind all the antiapoptotic proteins expressed in our biological model, namely Bcl2, Bcl-xL and Mcl-1. Thus, for the sake of simplicity, we denoted by the cumulative concentration of those three antiapoptotic proteins.

We then modeled Bax activation. In non-apoptotic conditions, Bax spontaneously adopts a closed 3D-conformation that does not bind antiapoptotic proteins [10]. This conformation was denoted . During apoptosis, Bax transforms into an opened 3D-conformation () and inserts strongly into the MOM. molecules can be inhibited by antiapoptotic proteins which trap them into dimers. Moreover, they may spontaneously transform back into their closed conformation [42].

If they are not inhibited, molecules may oligomerize into molecules and create pores in the MOM which correlates with the release into the cytosol of apoptogenic factors, including cytochrome C [8][10]. We considered that was inefficient at binding oligomerized Bax [7]. In the model, Bax oligomerization happens either by the oligomerization of two molecules or by a much faster autocatalytic process in which a molecule recruits a molecule to create two molecules. Those two processes occurred at the respective rates and which were chosen such that to account for the preponderance of the autocatalytic pathway.

Bax activation from into isoforms was assumed to be catalyzed by the BH3-only activator . We assumed that this reaction occurred in a “kiss and run” manner and therefore follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics. resulted from activation by truncation which occurred at the rate [43]. BH3-only activator can also be inhibited by which trap it into complexes. Those complexes may be dissociated by active Bik molecules which bind to and release [13]. Finally, we also considered that antiapoptotic proteins directly inhibit active Bik molecules and associate into complexes.

Above-mentioned chemical reactions that occur spontaneously were assumed to follow the law of mass action. All protein concentrations are expressed in nM in the mathematical model. This mathematical model is recapitulated in Figure 5 and Table 2. It can be written as follows:(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)

thumbnail

Figure 5. Considered molecular pathways of mitochondrial apoptosis.

is activated upon death stimulus () and inhibits Bcl2 antiapoptotic activity on BH3 activator . Free then activates closed Bax molecules into which binds to the mitochondrial membrane. molecules then oligomerize with each other () in an autocatalytic process. Oligomerized Bax molecules create pores in the mitochondrial membrane which allow the release of apoptogenic factors in the cytosol, leading the cell to apoptosis. Bcl2 also inhibits and .

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011.g005
thumbnail

Table 2. Parameters values for the apoptosis model.

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011.t002

Bik total protein amount was assumed to be constant during apoptosis as experimentally demonstrated (Figure 4 A). We also assumed that , and total amounts remained constant following the death stimulus. However, the apoptotic stress may induce Bax transcription and repress Bcl2 one, in particular through the activation of p53 [44]. Four conservation laws hold:



Only seven from the eleven equations of the mathematical model 4–14 need to be solved as the four remaining variables can be computed using those conservation laws.

We subsequently modeled the cell population behavior. Let us denote by the percentage of surviving cells at time t. No cell division was assumed to occur in presence of staurosporine as the very first effect of most cytotoxic drug consists in stopping the cell cycle [45]. Natural cell death was neglected as almost no apoptosis was observed in either parental or Src-transformed cells in the absence of death stimuli [5]. We considered that apoptosis is irreversibly activated when concentration reaches the threshold which corresponds to the minimal amount of oligomerized Bax molecules required to trigger the cytochrome C release into the cytosol. This assumption was modeled in equation 15 by a S-shape function which also ensures that the death rate does not grow to infinity. Below is the equation for the percentage of surviving cells:(15)

Parameters , a and were assumed to be the same for the two cell populations.

At the initial time just before the apoptotic stress, cells were assumed to be in steady state conditions. The initial percentage of surviving cells is . Bik initial concentrations were set to steady-state values computed using equations 12. Moreover, we assumed that Bik was entirely under its inactive form so that: , , . All Bax molecules are assumed to be inactive: , and . All existing molecules are trapped in complexes with : and . Initial protein concentration of Bid and Bcl2 can be computed using the conservation laws: and . For the sake of simplicity, we considered that no complexes were present at the initial time () as dimers do not play any part in the overall dynamics since we assumed that they do not dissociate.

As previously stated, the considered apoptotic stress consists of an 8-hour-long exposure to staurosporine (2 M) which starts at time t = 0. It triggers two molecular events: activation into and formation representing truncation into . Mathematically, and are set to non-zero values at the initial time.

Estimating parameters of the mitochondrial apoptosis model

Parameters of this model of mitochondrial apoptosis were estimated by fitting experimental data in parental and Src-transformed cells from [5] and integrating biological results from literature. First, we assessed quantitative molar values of considered Bcl-2 family proteins in non-apoptotic conditions as follows. We set Bax total concentration in Src-transformed cells to 100 nM according to [46] in which the authors stated that this was a physiological level in tumor cells. This value is also in agreement with concentration ranges found in the literature [33], [34], [36], [47], [48]. Then, in [46], they found that anti-apoptotic total concentration had to be 6 times higher than that of Bax in order to prevent apoptosis. Therefore, we set in Src-transformed cells. Concerning Bid total concentration, we assumed which is in agreement with experimental results from the literature [33], [34], [36], [47]. Finally, tBid initial concentration was set to 1 nM since this band was hardly detectable by western-blot (Figure 3). Moreover, this value was consistent with previous modeling results [47].

We then computed protein ratios between parental and Src-transformed cells using immunoblotting data of Figure 3. We experimentally determined that there was a 9-fold higher amount of proteins in the cytosol fraction compared to the mitochondria compartment which allowed us to compute protein ratios of total intracellular quantities (Table 1). As previously stated, Bik protein amount was reduced in Src-transformed cells by a factor of 0.2 compared to parental fibroblasts (Figure 3). This dramatic decrease was the result of the Src-dependent activation of Erk1/2 kinases, leading to Bik phosphorylation, polyubiquitylation and subsequent degradation by the proteasome [5]. Bax steady-state level in non-apoptotic conditions was increased by a factor of 2.1 in Src-transformed cells compared to normal ones and that of Bid was decreased by a factor of 0.77. Concerning antiapoptotic molecules, the sum of Bcl2, Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 quantities was slightly increased in Src-transformed cells by a factor of 1.1 compared to parental ones. Those protein ratios were used to compute molar quantities of considered Bcl-2 family protein total concentrations (Table 1).

Then, we estimated the apoptotic threshold as follows. Quantification of Figure S1d in [5] showed that 38% of BAX molecules at the mitochondria were activated during apoptosis. Previously-described quantification of Figure 3 showed that 33% of BAX total amount were located at the mitochondria, the remaining part being in the cytosol. Therefore, the percentage of activated BAX was set to 33% * 38%/10013%. This percentage is in agreement with previous experimental data which suggests that approximately 10–20% of Bax total amount is actually activated during apoptosis [46].

The high intensity of the bands corresponding to Bcl-xL expression in Figure 3 suggested that it might be the predominant antiapoptotic protein in our biological model. Dissociation constant between Bcl-xL and respectively Bik, Bid and Bax was experimentally found to be equal to nM, nM and nM [49], [50]. Therefore, we set and and only estimated . At this point, 10 kinetic parameters still needed to be estimated.

In order to determine those 10 parameters, we fitted experimental data from Figure 6 under constraints inferred from experimental results. We used the three experimental data points of Figure 6 corresponding to exposure to staurosporine as a single agent or combined with herbimycin. We modeled the administration of staurosporine after an exposure to the Src tyrosine kinase inhibitor herbimycin as follows. We assumed that herbimycin was administrated before staurosporine exposure such that the system had time to reach steady state. As previously described, herbimycin exposure was modeled by decreasing (the maximal velocity of Src-induced Bik ubiquitylation) of 98% of its original value.

thumbnail

Figure 6. Apoptosis in parental (blue) and Src-transformed (orange) NIH-3T3 cells.

Bars represent simulations of the calibrated model of mitochondrial apoptosis. Experimental datapoints for staurosporine given as a single agent or combined with herbimycin were used for parameter estimation. They are reprinted from [5]. Datapoints for the combination of staurosporine with ABT-737 are original data and were used for model validation.

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011.g006

Then, we set constraints on state variables as follows. We assumed that did not decrease below 20% (i.e. the apoptotic threshold ) of its initial value within 6 h of staurosporine exposure as approximately 20% of Bax total quantity is activated during apoptosis [9], [46]. Moreover, we ensured that reached the apoptotic threshold in parental cells after 6 to 8 h of exposure to staurosporine as biological experiments showed. Moreover, as Bax oligomerization was assumed to be an autocatalytic process, we expected to obtain . Therefore, in the parameter estimation procedure, we set initial search values for and such that . Finally, molecule association rates were searched between and which is a realistic range with respect to the diffusion limit [48]. Estimated parameter values are shown in Table 2.

The data-fitted mathematical model allowed the investigation of the dynamical molecular response to staurosporine exposure (Figure 7). As expected, higher Bik concentration in normal fibroblasts led to a higher concentration of and of free compared to transformed cells. molecules then activated into which oligomerized until reaching the apoptotic threshold in parental cells. On the contrary, could efficiently be sequestered in complexes with antiapoptotic proteins in Src-transformed cells as a result of the lower level of Bik protein. This perfectly fit the described function of Bik as a sensitizer [51].

thumbnail

Figure 7. Simulated molecular response to staurosporine exposure of parental (blue) and Src-transformed (orange) NIH-3T3 cells.

Higher Bik concentration in normal fibroblasts led to a higher concentration of and of free . molecules then activated into which oligomerized until reaching the apoptotic threshold in control cells but not in Src-transformed cells. Time is expressed in min and concentrations in nM.

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011.g007

Concerning co-administration of staurosporine and herbymicin, the model predicted that this drug combination circumvents the resistance of the cancer cell population in which 99% of cells are apoptotic after 8 hours of exposure to staurosporine (Figure 6). This model behavior was in agreement with experimental data which showed 98% of apoptotic cells in the Src-transformed population. Moreover, the model predicted that an exposure to staurosporine as a single agent or combined with herbimycin lead to the same activity of 80% of apoptotic cells in the parental fibroblasts population.

Theoretical anticancer therapy optimization and experimental validation

We intended to determine optimal therapeutic strategies for our particular biological system in which parental and Src-transformed NIH-3T3 fibroblasts stand for healthy and cancer cells respectively. In the following, both cell populations are exposed simultaneously to the same drugs, mimicking the in vivo situation in which healthy and tumor tissues are a priori exposed to the same blood concentrations of chemotherapy agents. From a numerical point of view, identical parameter changes were applied to normal and cancer cells.

First, we investigated the combination of staurosporine with ABT-737, a competitive inhibitor of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL that were the main antiapoptotic proteins in our cellular model. ABT-737 inhibits free antiapoptotic proteins but also dissociates complexes of anti- and pro-apoptotic proteins. As for herbimycin, we assumed that ABT-737 was administrated before staurosporine such that the system had time to reach steady state. ABT-737 pre-incubation was thus modeled by decreasing Bcl-2 total amount in proportion to ABT-737 concentration and by setting and at the initial time.

Interestingly, ABT-737 exposure in the absence of staurosporine (i.e. ) did not result in cell death induction for any dose of ABT-737 in the mathematical model, as experimentally demonstrated [5]. Indeed, in the absence of staurosporine, Bid was not activated into tBid and the low quantity of tBid present in the cells at steady state was not sufficient to trigger Bax oligomerization, even when ABT-737 inhibited all anti-apoptotic proteins. This confirmed that the mathematical model described correctly this cell model that does not behave as a “primed for death model” in which inhibition of anti-death proteins results in death, even in the absence of apoptosis induction. As a reminder, in the primed for death situation, incubation with ABT-737 led to cell death as a consequence of the release of the BH3-only pro-apoptotic proteins that were therefore able to activate Bax. The main difference between the primed for death situation and our model is that apoptosis resistance in the primed for death model primary comes from the overexpression of anti-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl-xL or Bcl2 that are efficiently inhibited by ABT-737 whereas here it comes from the decrease of a pro-death protein in the Src-transformed model.

The combination of staurosporine and ABT-737 at any concentration, i.e. for any decrease in Bcl2 total protein amount, was predicted by the model to induce much more apoptosis in parental cells compared to Src-transformed cells and thus to fail in circumventing cancer cells resistance (Figure 8). To experimentally confirm this model prediction, we pre-incubated parental and Src-transformed cells with ABT-737 prior to staurosporine exposure. The resulting death-inducing effect on Src-transformed cells was significantly increased compared to staurosporine alone (Figure 6). However, as anticipated by the model, this drug combination resulted in an extremely high toxicity of 99% of apoptotic cells in the parental fibroblasts population (Figure 6). Those data points were reproduced by the calibrated mathematical model for a predictive decrease of 182 nM in Bcl2 total concentrations in both cell types.

thumbnail

Figure 8. Simulated cell death after staurosporine exposure and preincubation with ABT-737, in parental (blue) and Src-transformed (orange) NIH-3T3 cells.

Anti-apoptotic inhibitors such as ABT-737 was modeled as a decrease in the amount of Bcl2 molecules. For any dose of inhibitors, i.e. any decrease of Bcl2 total quantity, simulated apoptosis was greater in parental fibroblasts compared to Src-transformed cells. Moreover, only the administration of high doses managed to circumvent resistance of transformed cells which also induced an extremely high toxicity.

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011.g008

After that, we looked for theoretically optimal therapeutic strategies by applying optimization procedures on the calibrated model of the mitochondrial apoptosis. Optimal strategies were defined as those which maximized efficacy in cancer cells under the toxicity constraint that less than 1% of healthy cells die during drug exposure. We investigated drug combinations that consisted of the exposure to staurosporine after treatment with Src inhibitors, or up- or down-regulators of BCL-2 family proteins. Pre-incubation with inhibitors or activators aimed at modifying the equilibrium of the biological system before exposure to the cytotoxic drug. Src inhibition was simulated by a decrease in value whereas up- or down-regulation of Bcl-2 family proteins were modeled by modifying the total concentration of the targeted proteins.

The theoretically-optimal drug combination would consist of administering staurosporine combined with inhibitors of Src, Bax and Bcl2, together with a upregulator. The concentration of Bax inhibitor should be set such that Bax total concentration decreases below the apoptotic threshold in healthy cells thus protecting them from apoptosis. As Bax total amount was higher in cancer cells, it would remain high enough to allow these cells to undergo apoptosis. Once healthy cells are sheltered from apoptosis, Bcl2 amount could be decreased, using for instance ABT-737, and amount increased at the same time without risking any severe toxicity. As expected, the optimal therapeutic strategy also included the suppression of the Src-dependent phosphorylation of Bik in cancer cells, using for instance herbimycin. This drug combination led to 99% of apoptotic cells in the cancer cell population and less than 1% in the parental one where Bax was hardly present (Figure 9, Text S1).

thumbnail

Figure 9. Simulated molecular response to the optimal therapeutic strategy in parental (blue) and Src-transformed (orange) NIH-3T3 cells.

The optimal strategy consisted of exposing cells to staurosporine after exposure to four chemicals: an Src inhibitor, which annihilates Bik Src-dependent ubiquitylation in cancer cells, a Bax inhibitor such that Bax quantity is lower than the apoptotic threshold in normal cells, a Bcl2 inhibitor and an agent which enhances Bid transcription. Under this therapeutic strategy, remained under the apoptotic threshold in normal cells and exceeded it in cancer cells. Time is expressed in min and concentrations in nM.

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011.g009

This theoretically optimal strategy involved the administration of a cytotoxic agent combined with four other chemicals, which may not be realistic in the perspective of clinical application. Therefore we hierarchically ranked the considered therapeutic agents by searching for optimal strategies consisting in the combination of staurosporine with only one or two agents. Strategies which satisfied the tolerability constraint (i.e. less than 1% of apoptotic parental cells) and reached an efficacy value of 99% of apoptotic cells all involved Bax downregulation in addition to a second agent among Bcl2 downregulator, upregulator and Src inhibitor (See Text S1 for more details). Of note, isolated decrease of Bax total amount fulfilled the tolerability constraint but resulted in less than 1% of apoptotic cancer cells.

Finally, we experimentally validated feasibility of this counterintuitive theoretical strategy. We selected two siRNAs that fully downregulated Bax in parental cells but not in Src-transformed ones (Figure 10 A). Bax knockdown protected parental cells from treatment by staurosporine and ABT737 or staurosporine and herbimycin but not Src-transformed cells (Figure 10 B). Therefore by downregulating Bax in our biological model, we were capable of selectively killing Src-transformed cells.

thumbnail

Figure 10. Bax downregulation allowed an advantage to parental cells compared to Src-transformed ones.

A Bax was downregulated in parental (3T3) and Src-transformed (Src) cells using two different siRNAs (see Material & Methods) such that Bax was not detectable anymore in parental fibroblasts. This was possible since Bax level was higher in transformed cells compared to parental ones (Figure 3) B After Bax downregulation, parental cells were highly resistance to exposure to staurosporine given as a single agent, combined with ABT-737 or combined with herbimycin. On the contrary, Src-transformed cells were killed by staurosporine combined with ABT-737 or herbymicin.

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011.g010

Discussion

A combined mathematical and experimental approach was undertaken to study the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in parental and Src-transformed NIH-3T3 cells. First, a mathematical model for Bik kinetics in normal and apoptotic conditions was built. It took into account Bik ubiquitylation and further proteasomal degradation that Src-dependent Bik phosphorylation stimulated in Src-transformed cells. Then, we designed a mathematical model of the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis which only involved the proteins that participated in apoptosis induction in the studied biological model. Interestingly, this mathematical model was quite simple, with only one effector, Bax, two BH3-only proteins, Bik (a sensitizer) and tBid (a direct Bax activator), and a pool of antiapoptotic proteins which were all described as behaving identically toward Bax, Bik and tBid [38].

Several published works propose mathematical modeling of apoptosis. Some of them model all pathways to apoptosis from the death stimulus to the actual cell death [52][54], other focus on the caspase cascade leading to apoptosis [55]. Molecular modeling of the mitochondrial pathway was achieved in several works [47], [48], [56][59]. Those models being conceived to address other biological issues, we had to build a new mathematical model that was tailored to our particular problematic and aimed at optimizing anticancer therapies in the specific case of Src transformation.

Exploring Bik kinetics upon apoptosis induction led to the interesting prediction that the inhibition of Bik degradation might not allow its accumulation above a threshold that would induce apoptosis in the experimentally-demonstrated time range. This was validated by immunoblotting that established that Bik concentration was not changed upon apoptosis induction by staurosporine. Therefore, we looked for another explanation that might support these observations. A possibility was that Bik might undergo activation upon apoptosis induction. Activation of BH3-only proteins has already been described and can depend on phosphorylation/dephosphorylation as observed for Bad or Bim or on proteolytic activation as for Bid. These post-translational modifications usually result in a change of cell compartment, from cytosol to mitochondria for Bad, from cytoskeleton to mitochondria for Bim. Therefore, we looked for a clue pointing towards Bik activation during apoptosis induction. Indeed, we observed that a significant part of Bik translocated from the ER, which is its normal location, to mitochondria upon staurosporine treatment. This could be due to the release of Bik from a protein complex with the ER protein GRP78 as described in [41]. However, we could not rule out that this relocation might also be linked to the hyperfusion and subsequent mitochondria fission process observed upon a number of apoptosis stresses [60] or more specifically associated with Bik [61].

The mathematical model of apoptosis induction was used to explore anticancer therapies. First, it confirmed that Src inhibitor circumvented resistance to staurosporine exposure of Src-transformed cells, which was experimentally demonstrated. It also showed that this therapeutic strategy did not give any specific advantage to parental cells. It also predicted that inhibitors of antiapoptotic proteins should not be co-administered with staurosporine in our particular biological system as a result of the slightly lower antiapoptotic protein concentration in Src-transformed cells compared to parental ones. This model prediction was experimentally validated. Indeed, here, resistance to apoptosis comes from the decrease in a pro-apoptotic protein in Src-transformed cells and not from the overexpression of antiapoptotic proteins as frequently observed, which explains why a drug inhibiting antiapoptotic proteins could not target specifically transformed cells.

We then investigated theoretically-optimal therapeutic strategies. Interestingly, all optimal drug combinations took advantage of the observed Bax overexpression in Src-transformed cells. The optimal therapeutic strategies consisted of the combination of a cytotoxic agent for the induction of apoptosis (staurosporine in the model) with Bax downregulator and one agent among Src inhibitor, Bcl2 inhibitor or tBid upregulator. We experimentally validated this counterintuitive prediction by demonstrating in our biological model that Bax knockdown could protect parental cells but not Src-transformed cells from combinations of staurosporine with antiapoptotic protein or Src tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

This strategy might be challenging in clinics since siRNA targeting Bax would need to have the exact same pharmacokinetic properties as inhibitors of tyrosine kinase or of antiapoptotic proteins to target all the places where there is expected to be cytotoxicity. Moreover it would be of importance to also downregulate Bak, due to redundancy between Bax and Bak [62]. It would also be of interest to check for Bax/Bak upregulation in various tumors. Therefore, this study supports the need for further development of Bax/Bak inhibitors that might open a therapeutic window for kinase or antiapoptotic protein inhibitors that would otherwise be globally harmful for the patient when combined with a cytotoxic treatment.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and drug exposure

Parental and v-src transformed NIH-3T3 cells were cultured as described in [5]. When indicated, cells were exposed to staurosporine (2 M) during 8 hours and pre-incubated overnight with herbimycin (1 M) or ABT-737 (1 M) prior to staurosporine exposure.

Immunoblotting

Immunoblotting was performed as described in [5].

Confocal microscopy

For the analysis of Bik relocalization to mitochondria upon staurosporine exposure, cells were pre-incubated with Mitotracker-red (1:10,000) for 20 min before a 20 min washing in fresh medium. Then, cells were fixed by addition of paraformaldehyde (4%). Mitotracker-red background was removed by a 10 min incubation in acetone at −20°C prior further processing according to standard procedures. Endogenous Bik was detected by the specific anti-Bik-BH3 antibody (1:200). The secondary antibody (Molecular Probe) was labeled with FITC. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst-33342 dye (1:50,000) in the mounting medium. Images were acquired by confocal microscopy on a Axiovert 100 M, LSM510 (Zeiss) using a Plan Apochromat 63x/1.4 Oil DIC objective. Colocalization of Bik fluorescence and mitotracker staining was quantified using ImageJ software in 30 single cells treated with staurosporine for 2 h.

Bax downregulation

siBax1 (MMC.RNAI.N007527.12.2) and siBax2 (MMC.RNAI.N007527.12.4) were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies. 100.000 cells were transfected with 10 nM siRNA using Lipofectamine RNAimax (Life Technologies). 48 h later, cells were treated overnight either by ABT737 or herbimycin. The day after, apoptosis was induced by staurosporine treatment (exposure to 2 M during 8 hours).

Mathematical modeling and parameter estimation

Matlab ode15s solver was used to solve the systems of ordinary differential equations. Parameter estimation for Bik kinetics model consisted of a least-square approach in which minimization tasks were performed by the CMAES algorithm ([63], Text S1). Parameter estimation for the mitochondrial apoptosis model involved the design of a cost function which was also minimized by the CMAES algorithm. This cost function was the sum of a Least square term accounting for the fitting of experimental data of Figure 6 and a term for the constraints described in the Results section. This term was equal to zero when all constraints were satisfied and to a thousand times the number of unsatisfied constraints otherwise [64].

Therapeutics optimization

Optimization procedures for the design of therapeutic strategies consisted of maximizing efficacy under the constraint of toxicity not exceeding a tolerability threshold. In order to address this issue we minimized a cost function which was the sum of two terms. The first one consisted of the percentage of surviving cells in the cancer cell population which has to be minimized. The second term was equal to zero when the toxicity constraint was satisfied and took a high value (e.g. 1000) otherwise. Minimization tasks were performed by the CMAES algorithm [63].

Supporting Information

Text S1.

This text contains details about parameter estimation of the Bik kinetics model as well as additional information on numerical simulations for therapeutics optimization.

doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003011.s001

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the permission from Nature Publishing Group to reprint Figures 2A and 3, which contain images from [5].

Author Contributions

Mathematical modeling, parameter estimation and computational procedure for optimization: AB MD. Conceived and designed the experiments: AB JL PG MD GG. Performed the experiments: JL NP PG. Analyzed the data: AB JL PG MD GG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AB JL PG MD GG. Wrote the paper: AB JL PG MD GG.

References

  1. 1. Ingley E (2008) Src family kinases: regulation of their activities, levels and identification of new pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta 1784: 56–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.08.012
  2. 2. Cartwright CA, Meisler AI, Eckhart W (1990) Activation of the pp60c-src protein kinase is an early event in colonic carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87: 558–62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.2.558
  3. 3. Talamonti MS, Roh MS, Curley SA, Gallick GE (1993) Increase in activity and level of pp60c-src in progressive stages of human colorectal cancer. J Clin Invest 91: 53–60. doi: 10.1172/jci116200
  4. 4. Nautiyal J, Majumder P, Patel BB, Lee FY, Majumdar AP (2009) SRC inhibitor dasatinib inhibits growth of breast cancer cells by modulating EGFR signaling. Cancer Lett 283: 143–51. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.03.035
  5. 5. Lopez J, Hesling C, Prudent J, Popgeorgiev N, Gadet R, et al. (2012) Src tyrosine kinase inhibits apoptosis through ERK1/2-dependent degradation of the death accelerator Bik. Cell Death and Differentiation 19: 1459–69 doi:10.1038/cdd.2012.21.
  6. 6. Brenner D, Mak TW (2009) Mitochondrial cell death effectors. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21: 871–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.09.004
  7. 7. Goldstein JC, Waterhouse NJ, Juin P, Evan GI, Green DR (2000) The coordinate release of cytochrome c during apoptosis is rapid, complete and kinetically invariant. Nat Cell Biol 2: 156–62.
  8. 8. George NM, Targy N, Evans JJ, Zhang L, Luo X (2010) Bax contains two functional mitochondrial targeting sequences and translocates to mitochondria in a conformational change- and homo-oligomerization-driven process. J Biol Chem 285: 1384–92. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m109.049924
  9. 9. Wolter KG, Hsu YT, Smith CL, Nechushtan A, Xi XG, et al. (1997) Movement of Bax from the cytosol to mitochondria during apoptosis. J Cell Biol 139: 1281–92. doi: 10.1083/jcb.139.5.1281
  10. 10. Lalier L, Cartron PF, Juin P, Nedelkina S, Manon S, et al. (2007) Bax activation and mitochondrial insertion during apoptosis. Apoptosis 12: 887–96. doi: 10.1007/s10495-007-0749-1
  11. 11. Wang C, Youle RJ (2009) The role of mitochondria in apoptosis. Annu Rev Genet 43: 95–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134850
  12. 12. Thomadaki H, Scorilas A (2006) Bcl2 family of apoptosis-related genes: functions and clinical implications in cancer. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 43: 1–67. doi: 10.1080/10408360500295626
  13. 13. Kim H, Rafiuddin-Shah M, Tu HC, Jeffers JR, Zambetti GP, et al. (2006) Hierarchical regulation of mitochondrion-dependent apoptosis by BCL-2 subfamilies. Nat Cell Biol 8: 1348–58. doi: 10.1038/ncb1499
  14. 14. Youle RJ, Strasser A (2008) The BCL-2 protein family: opposing activities that mediate cell death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (9): 47–59. doi: 10.1038/nrm2308
  15. 15. Perez D, White E (2000) TNF-alpha signals apoptosis through a bid-dependent conformational change in Bax that is inhibited by E1B 19K. Mol Cell 6: 53–63. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(05)00013-4
  16. 16. Cartron PF, Gallenne T, Bougras G, Gautier F, Manero F, et al. (2004) The first alpha helix of Bax plays a necessary role in its ligand-induced activation by the BH3-only proteins BID and PUMA. Mol Cell 16: 807–18. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.10.028
  17. 17. Pasteau S, Loiseau L, Brun G (1997) Proliferation of chicken neuroretina cells induced by v-src, in vitro, depends on activation of the E2F transcription factor. Oncogene 15: 17–28. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201177
  18. 18. Yuan K, Jing G, Chen J, Liu H, Zhang K, Li Y, et al. (2011) Calmodulin mediates FAS-induced FADD-independent survival signaling in pancreatic cancer cells via activation of Src-ERK. J Biol Chem 286: 24776–84. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m110.202804
  19. 19. Zhang S, Huang W-C, Li P, Guo H, Poh S-B, Brady SW, et al. (2011) Combating trastuzumab resistance by targeting SRC, a common node downstream of multiple resistance pathways. Nature Medicine 17: 461–469. doi: 10.1038/nm.2309
  20. 20. Araujo J, Logothetis C (2010) Dasatinib: a potent SRC inhibitor in clinical development for the treatment of solid tumors. Cancer Treat Rev 36: 492–500. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.02.015
  21. 21. Kopetz S, Shah AN, Gallick GE (2007) SRC continues aging: current and future clinical directions. Clin Cancer Res 13: 7232–6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-1902
  22. 22. Johnson FM, Gallick GE (2007) SRC family nonreceptor tyrosine kinases as molecular targets for cancer therapy. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 7: 651–9. doi: 10.2174/187152007784111278
  23. 23. Sepp-Lorenzino L, Ma Z, Lebwohl DE, Vinitsky A, Rosen N (1995) Herbimycin A induces the 20 S proteasome- and ubiquitin-dependent degradation of receptor tyrosine kinases. J Biol Chem 270: 16580–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.28.16580
  24. 24. Fesik SW (2005) Promoting apoptosis as a strategy for cancer drug discovery. Nat Rev Cancer 5: 876–85. doi: 10.1038/nrc1736
  25. 25. Oltersdorf T, Elmore SW, Shoemaker AR, Armstrong RC, Augeri DJ, et al. (2005) An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours. Nature 435: 677–81. doi: 10.1038/nature03579
  26. 26. Kang MH, Reynolds CP (2009) BCL2 inhibitors: targeting mitochondrial apoptotic pathways in cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res 15: 1126–32. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-08-0144
  27. 27. Reed JC, Stein C, Subasinghe C, Haldar S, Croce CM, et al. (1990) Antisense-mediated inhibition of BCL2 protooncogene expression and leukemic cell growth and survival: comparisons of phosphodiester and phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides. Cancer Res 50: 6565–70.
  28. 28. Lebedeva I, Rando R, Ojwang J, Cossum P, Stein CA (2000) Bcl-xL in prostate cancer cells: effects of overexpression and down-regulation on chemosensitivity. Cancer Res 60: 6052–60.
  29. 29. Kagawa S, Pearson SA, Ji L, Xu K, McDonnell TJ, et al. (2000) A binary adenoviral vector system for expressing high levels of the proapoptotic gene bax. Gene Ther 7: 75–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301048
  30. 30. Pataer A, Fang B, Yu R, Kagawa S, Hunt KK, et al. (2000) Adenoviral Bak overexpression mediates caspase-dependent tumor killing. Cancer Res 60: 788–92.
  31. 31. Tsuruta Y, Mandai M, Konishi I, Kuroda H, Kusakari T, et al. (2001) Combination effect of adenovirus-mediated pro-apoptotic bax gene transfer with cisplatin or paclitaxel treatment in ovarian cancer cell lines. Eur J Cancer 37: 531–41. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00431-7
  32. 32. Lo HW, Day CP, Hung MC (2005) Cancer-specific gene therapy. Adv Genet 54: 235–55.
  33. 33. Kuwana T, Mackey MR, Perkins G, Ellisman MH, Latterich M, et al. (2002) Bid, Bax, and lipids cooperate to form supramolecular openings in the outer mitochondrial membrane. Cell 111: 331–42. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01036-x
  34. 34. Kushnareva Y, Andreyev AY, Kuwana T, Newmeyer DD (2012) Bax Activation Initiates the Assembly of a Multimeric Catalyst that Facilitates Bax Pore Formation in Mitochondrial Outer Membranes. PLoS Biol 10: e1001394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001394
  35. 35. Lalier L, Cartron PF, Olivier C, Logé C, Bougras G, et al. (2011) Prostaglandins antagonistically control Bax activation during apoptosis. Cell Death Differ 18: 528–37. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.128
  36. 36. Schafer B, Quispe J, Choudhary V, Chipuk JE, Ajero TG, et al. (2009) Mitochondrial outer membrane proteins assist Bid in Bax-mediated lipidic pore formation. Mol Biol Cell 20: 2276–85. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e08-10-1056
  37. 37. Choi YB, Sandford G, Nicholas J (2012) Human herpesvirus 8 interferon regulatory factor-mediated BH3-only protein inhibition via Bid BH3-B mimicry. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002748. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002748
  38. 38. Chipuk JE, Moldoveanu T, Llambi F, Parsons MJ, Green DR (2010) The BCL-2 family reunion. Mol Cell 37: 299–310. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.025
  39. 39. Chinnadurai G, Vijayalingam S, Rashmi R (2008) Bik, the founding member of the BH3-only family proteins: mechanisms of cell death and role in cancer and pathogenic processes. Oncogene 27 Suppl 1: S20–9. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.40
  40. 40. Mathai JP, Germain M, Marcellus RC, Shore GC (2002) Induction and endoplasmic reticulum location of Bik/NBK in response to apoptotic signaling by E1A and p53. Oncogene 2: 2534–44. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205340
  41. 41. Zhou H, Zhang Y, Fu Y, Chan L, Lee AS (2011) Novel Mechanism of Anti-apoptotic Function of 78-kDa Glucose-regulated Protein (GRP78). J Biol Chem 286: 25687–25696. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m110.212944
  42. 42. Gilmore AP, Metcalfe AD, Romer LH, Streuli CH (2000) Integrin-mediated survival signals regulate the apoptotic function of Bax through its conformation and subcellular localization. J Cell Biol 149: 431–46. doi: 10.1083/jcb.149.2.431
  43. 43. Nicolier M, Decrion-Barthod AZ, Launay S, Prétet JL, Mougin C (2009) Spatiotemporal activation of caspase-dependent and -independent pathways in staurosporine-induced apoptosis of p53wt and p53mt human cervical carcinoma cells. Biol Cell 101: 455–67. doi: 10.1042/bc20080164
  44. 44. Miyashita T, Krajewski S, Krajewska M, Wang HG, Lin HK, et al. (1994) Tumor suppressor p53 is a regulator of bcl-2 and bax gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Oncogene 9: 1799–805.
  45. 45. Al-Ejeh F, Kumar R, Wiegmans A, Lakhani SR, Brown MP, et al. (2010) Harnessing the complexity of DNA-damage response pathways to improve cancer treatment outcomes. Oncogene 29: 6085–98. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.407
  46. 46. Jurgensmeier JM, Xie Z, Deveraux Q, Ellerby L, Bredesen D, et al. (1998) Bax directly induces release of cytochrome c from isolated mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 4997–5002. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.9.4997
  47. 47. Albeck JG, Burke JM, Spencer SL, Lauffenburger DA, Sorger PK (2008) Modeling a snap-action, variable-delay switch controlling extrinsic cell death. PLoS Biol 6: 2831–52. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060299
  48. 48. Hua F, Cornejo MG, Cardone MH, Stokes CL, Lauffenburger DA (2005) Effects of Bcl-2 Levels on Fas Signaling-Induced Caspase-3 Activation: Molecular Genetic Tests of Computational Model Predictions. J Immunol 175: 985–995. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.9.6235-b
  49. 49. Certo M, Del Gaizo Moore V, Nishino M, Wei G, Korsmeyer S, et al. (2006) Mitochondria primed by death signals determine cellular addiction to antiapoptotic BCL-2 family members. Cancer Cell 9: 351–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.027
  50. 50. Eskes R, Antonsson B, Osen-Sand A, Montessuit S, Richter C, et al. (1998) Bax-induced cytochrome C release from mitochondria is independent of the permeability transition pore but highly dependent on Mg2+ ions. The Journal of Cell Biology 143: 217–224. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.1.217
  51. 51. Adams JM, Cory S (2007) Bcl-2-regulated apoptosis: mechanism and therapeutic potential. Curr Opin Immunol 19: 488–496. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.05.004
  52. 52. Calzone L, Tournier L, Fourquet S, Thieffry D, Zhivotovsky B, et al. (2010) Mathematical modelling of cell-fate decision in response to death receptor engagement. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000702
  53. 53. Schlatter R, Schmich K, Avalos Vizcarra I, Scheurich P, Sauter T, et al. (2009) ON/OFF and beyond–a boolean model of apoptosis. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000595
  54. 54. Legewie S, Bluthgen N, Herzel H (2006) Mathematical modeling identifies inhibitors of apoptosis as mediators of positive feedback and bistability. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020120.eor
  55. 55. Rehm M, Huber HJ, Dussmann H, Prehn JH (2006) Systems analysis of effector caspase activation and its control by X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein. EMBO J 25: 4338–49. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601295
  56. 56. Bagci EZ, Vodovotz Y, Billiar TR, Ermentrout GB, Bahar I (2006) Bistability in apoptosis: roles of bax, bcl-2, and mitochondrial permeability transition pores. Biophys J 90: 1546–59. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.068122
  57. 57. Grills C, Crawford N, Chacko A, Johnston PG, O'Rourke F, et al. (2008) Dynamical systems analysis of mitochondrial BAK activation kinetics predicts resistance to BH3 domains. PLoS One 3: e3038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003038
  58. 58. Chen C, Cui J, Lu H, Wang R, Zhang S, et al. (2007) Modeling of the role of a Bax-activation switch in the mitochondrial apoptosis decision. Biophys J 92: 4304–15. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.099606
  59. 59. Cui J, Chen C, Lu H, Sun T, Shen P (2008) Two independent positive feedbacks and bistability in the BCL2 apoptotic switch. PLoS One 3: e1469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001469
  60. 60. Tondera D, Grandemange S, Jourdain A, Karbowski M, Mattenberger Y, et al. (2009) SLP-2 is required for stress-induced mitochondrial hyperfusion. Embo J 28: 1589–1600. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.89
  61. 61. Germain M, Mathai JP, McBride HM, Shore GC (2005) Endoplasmic reticulum Bik initiates DRP1-regulated remodelling of mitochondrial cristae during apoptosis. EMBO J 24: 1546–56. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600592
  62. 62. Wei MC (2001) Proapoptotic BAX and BAK: A Requisite Gateway to Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Death. Science 292: 727–730. doi: 10.1126/science.1059108
  63. 63. Hansen N (2006) The CMA evolution strategy: a comparing review. In: Lozano J, Larranaga P, Inza I, Bengoetxea E, editors. Towards a New Evolutionary Computation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 75–102.
  64. 64. Ballesta A, Dulong S, Abbara C, Cohen B, Okyar A, Clairambault J, Levi F (2011) A combined experimental and mathematical approach for molecular-based optimization of irinotecan circadian delivery. PLoS Comput Biol 7: e1002143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002143